알림 목록

Analysis Area: 18 cities and counties in Gyeongsangnam-do

Key Industries: Shipbuilding, Defense, Aerospace, Machinery, Automotive Parts, Nuclear Power, Smart Manufacturing

Analysis Agenda: Are the growth of Gyeongnam's key industries and employment recovery translating into youth job opportunities, wages, careers, and regional settlement?

Golden Time Type: Industrial Growth Opportunity + Youth Career Retention Risk

Version: Regional AX Golden Time Intelligence v3.2 Enhancement Standard

Reference Date: 2026.09.06

Gyeongnam's nominal Gross Regional Product (GRP) in 2024 was 151.2 trillion won, ranking third nationwide and first among non-capital regions; the manufacturing sector grew based on expanded orders and production in the shipbuilding, defense, aerospace, and nuclear power industries. In March 2026, the number of employed individuals in Gyeongnam's manufacturing sector also reached 438,000, an increase of 16,000 from the same month of the previous year . While total industrial production and employment have recovered, the net outflow of people in their 20s from Gyeongnam in 2024 was 11,183 , and the total net outflow was 9,069 . Structural changes moving in opposite directions are observed between the speed of industrial growth and the speed of youth settlement. If the manufacturing boom between 2026 and 2028 does not translate into job opportunities, income, or long-term careers for young people, industrial growth and the decline in the youth population will become entrenched simultaneously.  Gyeongnam is an industrial growth region, but it is not classified as a region for youth settlement. ( Gyeongnam Shinmun , Southeast Regional Statistics Office )

In 2024, while the 30s age group in Gyeongnam shifted to a net inflow and the 40s, 50s, and 60s and older also recorded net inflows, the 20s age group still experienced a net outflow of over 10,000 people. Among the reasons for migration to the Seoul metropolitan area, employment accounted for the largest share at **48.2%**, followed by education at **15.3%**. Population migration in Gyeongnam has shifted from a pattern where all generations leave to a structure where young people selectively leave due to further education, first employment, or early career stages. Management focused solely on total population and the number of employed individuals cannot identify the specific jobs, companies, or life stages that young people are leaving. If the outflow of those in their 20s persists for two to three years, the supply chains for new technical personnel and mid-level skilled workers in the manufacturing sector will weaken simultaneously.  The outflow of youth from Gyeongnam is not a retrospective result of population decline, but rather a leading evidence of the failure to reproduce the industrial workforce. ( Gyeongnam Shinmun )

In 2024, the number of young people aged 19 to 39 in Gyeongnam was 646,000 , accounting for 20.6% of the total population, a decrease of 6.1 percentage points compared to 2015. In the same year, the youth employment rate was 66.2% and the unemployment rate was 4.3% ; however, the proportion of the economically inactive youth classified as "having taken a break" rose to 22.0%, an increase of 10.3 percentage points from 2015. This confirms a structural issue where employment status does not equate to successful integration into the labor market. Employment and unemployment rates alone cannot separate job mismatches, job search interruptions, unstable employment, and out-of-region migration. If the outflow of "taking a break" youth and those in their 20s persists until 2028, employment recovery during the industrial boom will not translate into long-term settlement.  Currently, the "Golden Time" is Industrial Growth Opportunity + Youth Career Retention Risk. ( Southeast Regional Statistics Office )

Gyeongnam simultaneously possesses machinery, defense, and nuclear power industries in Changwon; shipbuilding in Geoje; aerospace in Sacheon; and automotive parts and machinery industries in Gimhae and Yangsan. With its Gross Regional Domestic Product (GRP) expanding to 151.2 trillion won in 2024 and manufacturing growth rates rising, Gyeongnam has reclaimed its position as the largest manufacturing economic zone outside the capital region. However, while industrial agglomeration has formed around production plants and contract-based firms, there is a lack of evidence that job functions preferred by young people—such as R&D, software, data, finance, planning, and professional services—have increased on the same scale. If production expands in Gyeongnam between 2026 and 2028 while high-value-added jobs remain at headquarters and research organizations in the capital region, the functional separation of regional industries will become entrenched.  Although Gyeongnam possesses a strong industrial scale, the strength of the job portfolio available for young people to choose from remains unconfirmed.

In March 2026, Gyeongnam’s economically active population stood at 1.869 million , the number of employed at 1.823 million , and the employment rate stood at 63.9% , a 1.0 percentage point increase from the same month of the previous year. The number of employed individuals in the manufacturing sector rose by 3.7% to 438,000, and the youth employment rate also climbed to 40.4%, a 4.6 percentage point increase from the same period last year . While it has been confirmed that the manufacturing boom is improving employment indicators, the company size, employment type, job function, wages, and length of service of these increased youth jobs are not separated from publicly available data. If employment gained during an economic upturn is not accumulated into skills and experience, it will be the first to disappear during periods of order adjustment.  Although youth employment in Gyeongnam has entered a recovery phase, its transition to stable employment remains uncertain. ( Gyeongnam Domin Ilbo )

The youth population in Gyeongnam declined from 26.7% of the total population in 2015 to **20.6%** in 2024. During the same period, the youth employment rate rose by 3.1 percentage points, but the proportion of the youth population decreased by 6.1 percentage points. This structure indicates that improvements in employment indicators do not translate into the maintenance of the youth population. There is no evidence distinguishing whether employed youth reside in Gyeongnam or whether youth working in the region move to find better career opportunities. If the employment rate continues to rise while the youth population declines in two to three years, the relationship between the number of jobs and regional settlement will weaken further.  The issue facing youth in Gyeongnam has shifted from whether or not they are employed to whether their careers remain in the region after employment.

Production and labor demand are expanding in the shipbuilding, defense, aerospace, and nuclear power industries due to large-scale orders and their designation as national strategic industries. These industries connect not only finished product manufacturers but also hundreds of partner companies and firms involved in parts, materials, maintenance, and design. However, there is no evidence at the supply chain level to confirm whether the industry's total order backlog leads to new hires, starting salaries, conversion to permanent positions, or three-year tenure for young people. Without linking orders and employment at the company level, it is impossible to determine whether the industrial boom is attributable solely to prime contractors and certain technical positions. If wages, working hours, and career conditions at partner companies are not improved between 2026 and 2028, labor shortages will be addressed by foreign workers, rehiring, and automation rather than by an influx of young people. While  the industrial boom in Gyeongnam has been confirmed, the boom in the youth employment ecosystem has not yet been verified.

Gyeongnam's youth policy has expanded to encompass the areas of employment, education, vocational training, housing, finance, culture, welfare, and participation. The 2026 implementation plan consists of 145 projects across five sectors totaling 493.2 billion won, with 216.6 billion won allocated to education and vocational training, 132.5 billion won to employment, 100.7 billion won to finance, culture, and welfare, and 41.3 billion won to housing. While policy input has increased, the results of this budget on the net mobility rate of those in their 20s, first-employment wages, 1- and 3-year tenure, intra-regional job turnover, and retention rates in Gyeongnam have not yet been accumulated. If the performance results for the 2026–2028 period are limited only to project beneficiaries and execution rates, it becomes impossible to distinguish whether industrial recovery or youth policy was the factor that altered mobility. Although  Gyeongnam's youth policy boasts a large-scale input system, its settlement outcome system remains incomplete. ( Gyeongsangnam-do Youth Information Platform )

The net outflow of people in their 20s from Gyeongnam in 2024 decreased compared to 16,635 in 2022 and 13,276 in 2023. While a shift toward a contraction in the scale of outflow after passing its peak has been confirmed, it still exceeds double the 5,177 recorded in 2014. Short-term improvement and long-term deterioration exist simultaneously, and there is no evidence to break down the causes of the decline into industrial boom, policies, a decrease in the school-age population, or reduced mobility. If only the absolute number of outflows decreases over the next two to three years while the net outflow rate relative to the age population remains constant, the effectiveness of policies will be overestimated.  Although there are signs of improvement regarding the outflow of youth from Gyeongnam, it is not yet at a level to be judged as a structural reversal.

The competitive structure of Gyeongnam's manufacturing industry is shifting from a focus on production volume and skilled labor to AI design, digital twins, robotics, autonomous manufacturing, predictive maintenance, and data-driven quality control. Consequently, the boundaries between production, technical, and research positions are blurring, and software and data interpretation capabilities are being integrated with mechanical, electrical, and electronic technologies. However, youth employment statistics in Gyeongnam are centered on major industrial classifications and employment status, failing to show the job roles created and entry-level tasks that will disappear following the AX (AI Transformation). If companies pursue AX primarily through experienced professionals and external specialists between 2026 and 2028, the number of entry-level jobs available for local youth will decrease.  The time-sensitive risk to youth employment in Gyeongnam stems more from delays in redesigning entry-level roles than from a decrease in the total number of jobs.

AI is compressing tasks previously handled by entry-level professionals, such as document creation, basic design, inspection records, and simple analysis. While manufacturing companies can increase productivity by integrating AI with existing skilled workers, young people may be unable to secure the initial work necessary to build their skills. There is no evidence linking automated entry-level tasks and newly created entry-level roles in Gyeongnam's key industries to hiring by age group. If an experience-oriented AI becomes entrenched for two to three years, a paradox arises where industrial productivity rises while new hiring of young people weakens.  Whether Gyeongnam's industrial AI leads to youth retention is determined not by the scale of AI adoption, but by the initial work assignments available to young people.

The criteria young people use to select a region have also expanded from a single wage to a life path that includes job growth potential, corporate mobility, housing, culture, and social networks. Although the average income of young people in Gyeongnam in 2023 was 25.78 million won—an increase of 5.73 million won from 2021— the net outflow of those in their 20s continued. This confirms a structural issue where rising average income alone cannot compensate for career value and satisfaction with settlement. There is no evidence comparing wage growth rates by job, inter-company mobility, disposable income after deducting housing costs, and opportunities for career transitions together. If the job premium in the Seoul metropolitan area increases further between 2026 and 2028, it will become difficult to retain young people in Gyeongnam based solely on its superior cost of living.  The unit of judgment regarding youth mobility has shifted from current salary to future career value.

The 2026 Gyeongnam Youth Policy Implementation Plan allocates 493.2 billion won to 145 projects, encompassing employment, education, housing, welfare, and participation. A policy structure has been established that addresses youth outflow as a life condition rather than a single employment program. However, there is no integrated evidence showing whether the participants in each project are the same youth, whether the combination of job and housing support extended tenure, or whether they remained in the region even after support ended. If performance data by project is separated over a period of two to three years, it becomes impossible to determine a causal relationship between budget expansion and a reduction in net outflow. While  the scope of Gyeongnam's youth policy has expanded, it has not been integrated into a settlement pathway for a single youth.

The Gyeongnam-type RISE, Glocal Universities, and Vocational Education Innovation Districts connect local universities, vocational high schools, and companies with the cultivation of talent for key industries. While the institutional intersection between education and industry has expanded, regional talent data tracking admissions, majors, corporate projects, employment, tenure, and transfers across a single cohort has not been confirmed. A gap remains where the number of talents trained by educational institutions and the actual hiring demand of local companies are tallied separately. If the migration paths of graduates from 2026 to 2028 are missed, it will be difficult to restore the rate of educational investment attributable to the region thereafter.  In Gyeongnam's talent policy, while a training system exists, a system for recovering talent from the region remains unconfirmed.

Gyeongnam simultaneously implements support programs for youth employment, encourages hiring by SMEs, work experience, startups, and housing costs. While these initiatives reduce the initial settlement costs for young people, the settlement effect vanishes if wages, job performance, or tenure do not improve after the support ends. There is a lack of evidence comparing one- and three-year tenure rates, wage growth rates, and turnover rates between supported and non-supported companies. If subsidy-dependent hiring does not transition to market wages and career systems within two to three years, the same programs must be repeated. Although  current policies are lowering entry costs, they have not yet reached a conclusion that they have changed the market value of local career experience.

In 2024, the proportion of South Korean youth residing in the Seoul metropolitan area stood at 54.8%, higher than the 50.8% share of the total population. Compared to the 49.1% share of youth in the capital area in 2000, the structure of greater concentration of talent and early careers in the capital region has been reinforced over the long term. The outflow of youth from Gyeongnam is not merely a result of policy failures in a single region, but rather stems from the concentration of the national youth labor market in the capital area. However, the excess outflow in Gyeongnam categorized by occupation, education, and corporate conditions cannot be separated solely from the explanation that this is a nationwide phenomenon. If concentration in the capital area continues alongside the nationwide decline in the youth population by 2030, non-capital manufacturing regions will simultaneously experience population decline and a decline in their ability to absorb talent.  Gyeongnam is a manufacturing region more directly exposed to the concentration of jobs in the capital area than to the nationwide decline in the youth population. ( Office of Government Policy Coordination )

In 2024, among young people in the Southeast region, the employment rate for Gyeongnam was **66.2%**, lower than Busan's 67.3% but higher than Ulsan's 64.1%. Average income in Gyeongnam was 25.78 million won, higher than Busan's 23.24 million won but lower than Ulsan's 26.93 million won. Although Gyeongnam is not the lowest region in terms of employment and income within the Southeast region, a large-scale outflow of youth has continued. This serves as comparative evidence that regional migration is not determined solely by average employment rates or average income. There are no comparative indicators that include job diversity, company size, culture, housing, transportation, and career mobility. Comparing only average figures over two to three years leads to a misjudgment of the regional values ​​that young people actually choose.  The outflow of youth from Gyeongnam is closer to a relative gap in career choices than to absolute poverty.

While Gyeongnam ranks among the top non-capital regions in terms of manufacturing scale and concentration of national strategic industries, the information and communication, professional services, and headquarters functions preferred by young people are more limited than in the capital area. If manufacturing competitiveness does not lead to the expansion of local service industries and digital roles, the industry's high value-added functions will be lost to external entities. There are no statistics showing which regional workplaces are assigned R&D, data, and software roles from Gyeongnam's manufacturing companies. If other regions expand both industry and urban services between 2026 and 2028, Gyeongnam will fall behind in terms of choice for young people despite its high productivity.  Gyeongnam's national strength lies in its manufacturing capabilities, while its comparative disadvantage in youth settlement stems from the combination of job opportunities and living conditions.

In 2024, the total net outflow of Gyeongnam was 9,069 people , while the net outflow for those in their 20s was 11,183 . This means that the net inflow of age groups aged 30 and older partially offset the outflow of those in their 20s. The statistical structure makes the actual severity of the youth exodus appear understated when looking only at the scale of the total net outflow. If migration by age group is not separated, improvements in population policy are mistaken for improvements in youth policy. If only total net migration is managed for two to three years, the decline in the core age group entering the industry is discovered belatedly.  The risk of generational shift is greater than the risk associated with the total population of Gyeongnam.

The net outflow of people in their 20s increased from 5,177 in 2014 to 16,420 in 2020 and 16,635 in 2022, before decreasing to 11,183 in 2024. While the recent decline signals a reversal, the scale of the outflow remains more than double compared to 10 years ago. There is a simultaneous presence of improvement relative to the peak and deterioration relative to the long-term baseline. It is difficult to accurately assess the extent of improvement without presenting both the net mobility rate, which reflects the decline in the youth population itself, and long-term time series data by reason for migration. If the decrease in net outflow figures between 2026 and 2028 is due to a reduction in the population parameter, the actual risk of migration does not decrease.  The outflow of youth from Gyeongnam cannot be judged as a structural improvement based solely on a decrease in absolute numbers.

In 2024, the youth employment rate in Gyeongnam rose by 3.1 percentage points compared to 2015, but the proportion of the youth population declined by 6.1 percentage points during the same period , while the proportion of those "taking a break" increased by 10.3 percentage points . This indicates a simultaneous rise in the employment rate, a shrinking youth base, and withdrawal from the labor market. The employment rate alone cannot distinguish between the out-of-region residence of the employed, changes in the denominator due to population decline, and discouraged job seekers. If the improvement in the employment rate over the next two to three years is managed solely as an achievement, the overall reproductive capacity of the regional labor market is overestimated.  The internal composition of youth employment in Gyeongnam is weaker than its surface indicators suggest.

The 2026 youth policy budget of 493.2 billion won and the 2024 net outflow of 11,183 people in their 20s are distinct figures that cannot be directly divided to translate into policy efficiency. However, the gap is clear: the budget for each project cannot be linked to changes in beneficiaries' employment, tenure, or relocation. It is a structure lacking a tracking identifier between fiscal input and mobility outcomes. Without this linkage from 2026 to 2028, policy contributions cannot be calculated even if the budget increases or net outflow decreases.  Gyeongnam measures the input to youth policies but fails to measure the cost of purchasing settlement.

The biggest gap is the lack of evidence linking industrial growth rates with the career value of young people . Gyeongnam manages industrial performance based on orders, production, exports, and employment, while youth policy manages the number of participants, education, employment, and housing support cases. Data regarding which youth jobs were created by industrial investment and how starting salaries and wages changed after three years are not recorded between the two systems. Once the industrial boom ends between 2026 and 2028, it becomes difficult to separate economic effects from policy effects.  The bottleneck for youth settlement in Gyeongnam is the separation of data between industrial performance and youth performance, rather than a lack of policy.

The second gap lies in the employment conditions between prime contractors and partner companies. While order performance in the shipbuilding, defense, and aerospace sectors is announced with a focus on prime contractors, a significant number of local youth begin their careers at small and medium-sized partner companies. Starting salaries, benefits, working hours, training, conversion to permanent status, and turnover rates at each stage of the supply chain are not disclosed in an integrated manner. Even when prime contractors are experiencing a boom and partner companies are facing hiring difficulties simultaneously, the causes cannot be broken down into wages, unit prices, or working conditions. If a career premium is not established at partner companies over a period of two to three years, young people do not leave the industry but rather avoid lower-tier jobs within the supply chain.  The youth retention effect of Gyeongnam's industries is blocked more by the career conditions of partner companies than by prime contractor orders.

The third gap is career mobility within the region. Young people evaluate the potential for growth by changing roles and companies within the same region, rather than the condition of working for a single company for their entire career. Although Gyeongnam has multiple industries such as shipbuilding, machinery, defense, aerospace, and automotive parts, common skills recognized among them and actual career transition paths have not been identified. If closed-system skills persist within individual companies, an economic downturn in one industry directly leads to an outflow of talent to other regions. If inter-industry mobility paths are not established between 2026 and 2028, strong industrial diversification will fail to function as a career safety net for young people.  While Gyeongnam has a broad industrial portfolio, the career portfolios of its youth are fragmented.

The fourth gap lies in the industrial entry of young women and non-manufacturing majors. Research on the outflow of youth from Gyeongnam identified employment and education as key reasons for migration, with a significant number of women in their early 20s moving out for educational purposes. Even with the expansion of manufacturing-centered policies, entry pathways into roles in professional services, content, design, bio, finance, and data remain limited. There is no evidence linking recruitment, tenure, and wage gaps by gender and major to the performance of key industries. If job biases persist for two to three years, the outflow of young women amplifies declines in birth rates and household formation.  The outflow of young women from Gyeongnam is not a welfare issue, but an indicator of bias in the industrial job structure. ( Gyeongnam Women & Family Foundation )

Gyeongnam possesses national industrial complexes, research institutes, universities, vocational high schools, and anchor companies in the shipbuilding, defense, and aerospace sectors. While the physical infrastructure and educational institutions for youth entry into industry exist, there is no data linking new hires, job roles, wages, tenure, or outflows of youth by industry. A gap exists between the scale of industrial infrastructure and the observability of talent retention. If workforce flow is not measured during the transition of orders from 2026 to 2028 into production, the baseline for the boom period will be lost. The  readiness of industrial infrastructure is assessed as high, while the readiness of data attributable to youth is assessed as low.

For 2026, youth policies have expanded to 145 projects across five sectors, and RISE, Glocal Universities, and Vocational Education Innovation Districts are also operated separately. While institutional measures exist on multiple levels, there is a lack of a common identification and performance framework to verify whether the same youth or company is being counted duplicated across various projects. A gap remains between project connectivity and data connectivity. If separate performance frameworks are maintained for two to three years, it is impossible to determine which combinations produced settlement effects, even if the total scale of support increases.  The institutional readiness is assessed as upper-middle, while the integrated runtime readiness is assessed as low.

Statistics for youth employment rates, unemployment rates, income, the status of those "taking a break," life satisfaction, and migration exist for 2024. However, longitudinal evidence showing the education-employment-job change-outward migration paths of the same youth has not been confirmed. Aggregate statistics explain the phenomenon but fail to capture warning signs immediately before migration. After 2028, the cost of bringing back youth who have established jobs, housing, and social networks outside the region will exceed the current cost of retention.  Gyeongnam youth data is currently at the level of verifying the status and has not reached the level of making preemptive judgments.

In the first quarter of 2026, the youth employment rate in Gyeongnam rose to 40.4%, a 4.6 percentage point increase from the same period of the previous year, and the number of employed individuals in the manufacturing sector also increased. Evidence confirms that the employment effects of the industrial boom have reached a segment of the youth population. However, the proportion of regular employees, those working at mid-sized companies or larger, those in AX job roles, and residents of Gyeongnam cannot be separated from the increase in youth employment. Consequently, it is impossible to determine whether the improvement in total employment volume is concentrated in specific industries, companies, or age groups. If the quality of employment is not tracked for two to three years, vulnerable employment groups will be the first to drop out when orders are adjusted.  While the volume of employment for youth has been confirmed, the expansion of sustainable careers remains unconfirmed.

The support programs for youth employment, work experience, and retention in small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) reduce initial labor costs and hiring risks for local companies. However, there is a lack of comparative evidence showing whether companies maintain the same wages and employment levels or whether young people advance to higher-level roles after the support ends. The structure separates the support period from the career development period. Even if short-term employment outcomes accumulate between 2026 and 2028, if job hopping outside the region is repeated after three years, no results regarding youth settlement remain.  While support reaching the companies can be verified, it is impossible to assess the impact of changes in the companies' employment structures.

In 2024, the average income of young people in Gyeongnam increased, and life satisfaction rose to 46.2%, a 1.7 percentage point increase from 2016. However, satisfaction with interpersonal relationships fell to 58.5%, a 1.7 percentage point decrease from 2017, and the perception of fairness dropped to 49.7%, an 8.7 percentage point decrease from 2021. Improvements in some economic indicators and a weakening of social perception appeared simultaneously. There is no evidence linking how youth policies have changed living conditions and trust in the region. If only economic support expands over two to three years without improvements in career fairness and mobility, the motivation to leave the region persists. While  policies are being implemented for young people, it is difficult to conclude that long-term trust in the region has also declined. ( Southeast Regional Statistics Office )

In 2024, only five out of the 18 cities and counties in Gyeongnam recorded a net inflow. The highest net inflow rates were recorded in Yangsan (1.3%), Uiryeong (0.3%), and Sacheon (0.2%), while the lowest net outflow rates were in Goseong (-1.6%), Haman (-1.2%), and Tongyeong (-1.1%). This confirms a spatial gap where the province's overall industrial growth and population migration by city and county do not move in the same direction. Evidence analyzing net youth migration by city and county in conjunction with industry, employment, and housing is limited. If the gap between industrial hubs and non-hub regions widens over the next two to three years, internal migration within Gyeongnam will also accelerate regional decline.  The outflow of youth from Gyeongnam is dualized by migration to the Seoul metropolitan area and the concentration of industrial hubs within the province.

Changwon, Gimhae, and Yangsan have relatively high numbers of companies, living services, and accessibility to education and transportation, while Geoje and Sacheon possess anchor companies in the shipbuilding and aerospace sectors. Conversely, the western inland and some county areas along the southern coast have fewer companies and job opportunities for young people to choose from. Even within the same industry, the distance to prime contractors, research institutes, and universities varies, yet there is no combined data on commuting time, housing costs, and job opportunities. If industrial investment is concentrated in existing hubs between 2026 and 2028, the concentration of living areas will proceed faster than the broader expansion of youth policies.  The settlement gap within Gyeongnam widens due to distances to companies and the career market rather than subsidies.

Busan and Ulsan are major destinations for young people moving out of Gyeongnam, while simultaneously serving as commuting, education, and consumption zones connected to the region's industries. Although outflows based on administrative boundaries are counted as regional losses, shifts in living zones—such as employees of Gyeongnam companies residing in Busan or graduates of Busan universities finding employment in Gyeongnam—must be assessed separately. There is a lack of evidence regarding the connection between residence, workplace, and commuting for young people in the Southeast region. If population competition based solely on administrative districts persists for two to three years, it leads to a misjudgment of the actual flow of talent at the industrial sphere level.  The settlement of young people in Gyeongnam should be determined not only by residence within the provincial boundaries but also by whether talent from the Southeast region is integrated into Gyeongnam's industries.

The net outflow of people in their 20s from Gyeongnam decreased from 16,635 in 2022 to 11,183 in 2024, and the youth employment rate rose in the first quarter of 2026. This marks an initial phase where the potential for simultaneous improvement in youth mobility and employment has emerged. However, as the causes of the decline and the quality of employment have not yet been analyzed, it remains unclear whether a structural reversal is possible. If follow-up data for 2026–2028 is not secured, the opportunity to separate the effects of economic boom, policies, and population decline will be lost.  Currently, this is not the point where the youth outflow has been resolved, but rather the time to verify the possibility of the first reversal.

Orders in the shipbuilding, defense, and aerospace industries follow a timeline structure that extends into production and hiring between 2026 and 2028. If young people fail to secure their first job roles and skills during this period, companies compensate for the production gap through experienced workers, external personnel, foreign labor, and automation. Entry pathways for young people that were not established during boom periods become even narrower during economic downturns. There is no evidence linking industry-specific order schedules with the timing of youth hiring, education, and graduation.  The current industrial boom represents the last favorable market segment for Gyeongnam to create a career market for young people.

In 2026, 145 youth policy projects will be implemented simultaneously with investments in RISE, vocational education, and Industrial AX. Since the project structure has not yet been fully fixed, there is still time to establish common outcomes; however, if the initial cohort tracking is omitted, subsequent additional projects and economic fluctuations will become intertwined. After 2028, policy effects will rely on post-implementation surveys.  The Golden Time for Gyeongnam's youth policy is not the period for creating more projects, but the period for identifying the local settlement effects of current projects from the outset.

12-1. Golden Time Application Case in Basic Local Governments ① — Changwon City

Changwon possesses the conditions to form the broadest manufacturing career market in Gyeongnam, as it houses the machinery, defense, and nuclear power industries, along with national industrial complexes, universities, and research institutes. While industrial agglomeration is confirmed, the career paths through which young people move from small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) to mid-sized or large corporations, or to R&D roles, remain undisclosed. Even with a large number of companies, if skill recognition and mobility pathways between firms are not visible, young people perceive moving to the Seoul metropolitan area as a safer career choice. Unless the defense and nuclear power booms of 2026–2028 translate into a local career ladder, Changwon’s industrial agglomeration will fail to create a premium for youth settlement.  Changwon’s "Golden Time" is not a period for increasing the number of jobs, but a period to verify whether careers can be sustained between companies.

12-2. Golden Time Application Cases in Basic Local Governments ② — Geoje City

While production and labor demand in Geoje have expanded due to the recovery of shipbuilding orders, the region still faces the burden of dependence on a single industry and lingering memories of past restructuring. Young people assess not only current hiring but also whether their careers can be maintained even during periods of order downturn. Data on the migration of shipbuilding roles to offshore plants, defense, smart ships, and other manufacturing sectors, as well as the skill recognition system, are not publicly disclosed in an integrated manner. If hiring during the boom period of 2026–2028 is centered on short-term production personnel, the outflow of youth will be repeated during the next economic adjustment.  Geoje’s "Golden Time" is the period to determine whether the recovery in shipbuilding hiring has been transformed into long-term careers capable of inter-industry mobility.

In 2024, Gyeongnam experienced a net outflow of 11,183 people in their 20s and 3,176 people in their teens. Young people who leave during the stages of further education or their first employment form their workplaces, housing, and social networks outside the region. The cost of returning after the move becomes greater than the cost of remaining before. If an outflow of the same scale is repeated for two to three years, the decline in the youth population translates not into a simple sum, but into a loss of career assets accumulated outside the region.  What is being missed now is not a single person, but the first three years of career experience that would not be accumulated in Gyeongnam.

Manufacturing AX brings about the simultaneous retirement of existing skilled workers and an increase in new digital roles. If young people fail to enter production, design, data, and quality roles, companies face both the aging of their current workforce and a shortage of future talent. There is a lack of evidence linking industry-specific retirement forecasts with the entry of young people. If retirements and increased orders overlap around 2028, skill gaps by job function will appear before total employment. What  Gyeongnam is missing is not the current production workforce, but the next generation of skilled workers for Manufacturing AX.

If the outflow of young women and non-manufacturing majors continues, the job composition of local industries becomes increasingly skewed toward production and technology. This job bias, in turn, creates a cyclical structure that exacerbates the outflow of young women and the decline in household formation. Evidence regarding the impact of outflows by gender and major on the diversity of the industrial ecosystem has not yet been integrated. If this cycle persists for two to three years, industrial and population policies will become causes of each other's failure.  What is currently being overlooked is not only the number of young people but also the diversity required for industries to expand into new fields.

Gyeongnam possesses a regional economy worth 151.2 trillion won, 438,000 manufacturing workers, multiple national strategic industries, and universities and research institutions. The physical infrastructure of companies and industries to demonstrate the youth career market already exists. However, there is a lack of evidence showing which job roles young people enter within this foundation and how they move between companies and industries. Connecting education, recruitment, tenure, job changes, and out-of-town transfers for the period 2026–2028 will confirm, for the first time, the attribution rate of industrial investment to youth.  The greatest asset currently available is not additional support programs, but the actual career map of youth within Gyeongnam's industries.

Gyeongnam is home to multiple industries, including shipbuilding, defense, aerospace, machinery, automotive parts, and nuclear power. While competencies in mechanical design, welding, quality, control, data, safety, and maintenance have the potential to be reused across these various industries, recognition standards for each company remain separate. Once evidence of inter-industry mobility is generated, young people can maintain their careers within Gyeongnam even during downturns in specific industries. If the potential for mobility is confirmed within two to three years, industrial diversification will function as an employment safety net for youth.  The structural asset currently available is not specific company jobs, but rather common skills whose value is maintained within the province.

The current period, characterized by a decrease in the net outflow of those in their 20s and an increase in youth employment, marks a point where a baseline can be established for policy and industrial effects. If data regarding job type, starting salary, one-year tenure, three-year growth, and relocation during this period are missed, subsequent economic fluctuations and new policies will become intertwined. Once the 2026–2028 cohort is secured, it will be possible to identify combinations among the 145 youth policy projects that have demonstrated actual settlement effects.  The time asset currently available serves as the initial baseline for verifying the causes of the reversal in youth outflow without distortion.

The scope of the AX response is not limited to the addition of youth subsidies or recruitment projects.  It is a structure that connects industrial investment → corporate recruitment → first job → skill growth → local job change → long-term employment → retention in Gyeongnam as a single Evidence Chain. Even if the number of manufacturing employees increases, if the 3-year employment of youth and retention in Gyeongnam do not improve, it is not judged as an achievement attributable to youth in the industry.

The first Runtime sets newly employed youth in the shipbuilding, defense, aerospace, and machinery industries as the baseline cohort. It records company size, prime contractor stage, job function, starting salary, and place of residence at the time of employment, and connects one year of service, wage changes, job mobility, and three years of retention in Gyeongnam on the same time axis. It also records whether youth policies were received and the support combinations to isolate policy effects.

The conditions for failure are not limited to a decrease in the number of employed people. While manufacturing employment and the youth employment rate are rising, the net outflow of people in their 20s persists, the retention rate of partner companies and the local turnover rate are not improving, and AI, R&D, and professional service roles are concentrated in the metropolitan area.

Industrial Growth Opportunity + Youth Career Retention Risk

Gyeongnam is not a region without industries for young people to find employment in. It possesses strong manufacturing and national strategic industries, and employment indicators have recently been recovering.

The current risk lies not in the absolute quantity of jobs, but in the fact that the growth value of industries is not being attributed to the job, wage, and career mobility of young people.

The period from 2026 to 2028 is a Golden Time where a manufacturing boom and the potential for a reduction in the outflow of people in their 20s overlap. Once this period passes, it becomes difficult to separate the impact of industrial performance from youth policies, and it becomes difficult to reverse the life and career foundations of young people formed outside the region.

Final Assessment: Industrial Base is High, Youth Employment Recovery is Upper-Middle, Job Diversity is Lower-Middle, Inter-firm Career Mobility is Low, Long-term Settlement Evidence is Low, and Time Risk is High.

The verification order is education → first employment → job suitability → 1 year of service → wage and skill growth → intra-regional movement → 3 years of remaining in Gyeongnam . An increase in any one of industrial orders, the number of employed people, or the number of policy beneficiaries is not considered a youth settlement achievement.

Runtime Chain

Industrial Growth Evidence → Youth Entry Job → Skill Accumulation → Career Mobility → Income Growth → Regional Retention

Structural insights remaining from this analysis

The structural gap in the outflow of youth from Gyeongnam does not lie in a lack of jobs. Gyeongnam possesses the largest manufacturing economy outside the capital region and growth industries such as shipbuilding, defense, aerospace, and nuclear power; furthermore, the number of manufacturing workers and the youth employment rate have recovered. What is lacking is connecting evidence that the growth value of industries has translated into the long-term career value of a single young person .

Companies record orders, production, and sales, while the administration records the employed, policy beneficiaries, and population migration. Universities record graduations and employment, but whether the same young person enters a specific company or job to raise their wages and skills and remains in Gyeongnam is not connected along a single timeline. As these three records remain separated, the phenomenon of industry growing while youth leave continues without contradiction.

An industry strong for young people is not one with many large corporations and factories. It is an industry with a strong market where one can secure a first job, have their skills recognized even when changing companies, and move their career to another sector even if the industry declines. Although Gyeongnam possesses multiple manufacturing industries, there is a lack of evidence that these have been connected to the local career market for young people.

Golden Time Thesis — Gyeongnam’s Golden Time from 2026 to 2028 is not a period for promoting more youth jobs, but rather a period to transform the growth of the shipbuilding, defense, aerospace, and machinery industries into a source of first jobs, skills, income, inter-firm mobility, and regional retention for young people. Once this connection is formed, Gyeongnam’s industrial diversification becomes a career safety net for youth. Without this connection, Gyeongnam maintains the contradiction of being a strong manufacturing region of South Korea while simultaneously being a region that young people leave for their future careers.

Major Evidence Sources

• Southeast Regional Statistics Office—2024 Annual Population Migration Statistics for the Southeast Region
• Southeast Regional Statistics Office—Southeast Region Population Migration Statistics, Q1 2025
• Southeast Regional Statistics Office—Life of Youth in the Southeast Region Through Statistics 2025
• Gyeongsangnam-do—2026 Youth Policy Implementation Plan
• Gyeongsangnam-do Youth Information Platform
• Gyeongnam Women & Family Foundation—Measures to Respond to Population Outflow of Young Women in Gyeongnam
• Gyeongnam Shinmun—Net outflow of people in their 20s in Gyeongnam has decreased but remains in the 10,000 range.
• Gyeongnam Shinmun—Gyeongnam Economic Indicators Based on 2024 Regional Income
• Gyeongnam Domin Ilbo—Gyeongnam Employment Trends Q1 2026
• Office for Government Policy Coordination—2nd Basic Plan for Youth Policy